<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE=edge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stephenwoods.net/wordpress/2008/01/23/ieedge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stephenwoods.net/wordpress/2008/01/23/ieedge/</link>
	<description>Wherein I discuss whatever</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean Benoit</title>
		<link>http://stephenwoods.net/wordpress/2008/01/23/ieedge/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Benoit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stephenwoods.net/wordpress/2008/01/23/ieedge/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with this point of view. Most articles I've seen about the MS desire to create yet another meta tag results in flaming without seeing the big benefit of this - which you've pointed out so nicely - corporate use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with this point of view. Most articles I&#8217;ve seen about the MS desire to create yet another meta tag results in flaming without seeing the big benefit of this - which you&#8217;ve pointed out so nicely - corporate use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.877 seconds -->
